Trevor Svajda vs Andre Ilagan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the recent months, Ilagan and Svajda have similar second serve success, with Ilagan at 42.73% and Svajda slightly ahead with 42.84%.
• Return Game Stats: Ilagan has an edge when it comes to returning second serves, winning 47.87% of opponent’s second serves compared to Svajda's 44.35%.
• Return First Serve: Svajda outperforms on first serve returns with a 30.56% success rate, while Ilagan stands at 25.28%.
• Breakpoint Defense: Ilagan demonstrates stronger resilience under pressure, saving 57.02% of breakpoints against him, while Svajda saves 49.55%.
• Overall Match Results: In the past year, Svajda has a superior match win rate at 68.57%, outperforming Ilagan who maintains a 52.86% win rate.
• Best Surface Performance: Both players excel on Hard surfaces, with Svajda boasting a 68% win rate and Ilagan at 62%. Could this be pivotal?
• Event Levels: Ilagan competes mostly in higher-level Challengers and ITF tournaments and wins 50% of matches, whereas Svajda dominates at lower-level events, winning 83.33%.
• Competition Level: Over the last year, Ilagan faces tougher opponents with an average ranking of 165.54, compared to Svajda's adversaries ranked 334.49 on average.
• Deciding Sets: In tight matches, Svajda has a bigger advantage, with 56% of deciding sets won, as opposed to Ilagan's 43%.
• Break Point Conversion: Svajda has a slight edge in converting breakpoints, successful 36.3% of the time compared to Ilagan's 33.58%.

Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Ilagan and Svajda presents a fascinating dynamic, as both players showcase unique strengths and vulnerabilities across various aspects of their gameplay.

Ilagan’s ability to return second serves effectively gives him a slight upper hand in disrupting Svajda’s serve. However, Svajda’s proficiency in returning first serves could be critical in applying pressure on Ilagan.

Despite Ilagan’s experience playing against higher-ranked opponents, Svajda’s impressive win rate on lower-level circuits cannot be ignored, and his aptitude for winning deciding sets might prove vital in crucial moments.

Both have their best career performances on Hard courts, yet Svajda’s overall consistency, coupled with a higher breakpoint conversion rate, suggests he could seize critical opportunities during the match.

Considering these factors, while Ilagan may pose a challenge, Svajda’s consistent performance and superior head-to-head stats make him the likely winner of this match.